Skip to main content
Case Study

Wind turbine tilting mast: independent structural verification before manufacture

Independent structural verification of a client-designed tilting mast in the 15–20 m height range, combining FEA, manual checks and a formal substantiation report.

Sprint

Renewable energy

Structural substantiation

FEA and manual calculations

Example FEA stress plot from the structural report

Example FEA stress plot from the structural report

Situation

A wind turbine manufacturer had developed a tilting mast in the 15–20 m height range and needed independent structural verification before manufacture.

The commission covered the mast structure and hydraulic lowering arrangement across the relevant operational and maintenance positions. Frugal was engaged to establish the assessment basis, complete the FEA and supporting manual checks, and document the findings in a formal structural substantiation report.

The real problem

The work extended well beyond checking an upright mast under a single static load case. The structure had to be assessed in its raised, lowered and intermediate maintenance positions, including the behaviour of the hydraulic lowering arrangement.

The verification also needed to address global strength and deflection, support reactions, local structural details, modal behaviour and fatigue. This required an engineering-led assessment strategy that identified the governing cases and presented traceable evidence for design review.

Constraints

  • Client-owned detailed design: Frugal assessed the mast, identified areas requiring revision and advised on practical changes; the client incorporated those changes into the detailed design.

  • Multiple analysis scenarios: verification had to cover the raised, lowered and critical-angle positions encountered during operation and maintenance.

  • Multiple assessment criteria: strength, deflection, support reactions, utilisation, modal behaviour and fatigue all had to be assessed.

  • Hybrid FE modelling: the structure required a mixed shell and solid model, multiple materials and realistic representation of its mass distribution.

  • Representative turbine loading: the turbine was outside the detailed FE model, but its mass distribution and representative geometry had to be included for accurate loading and modal results.

Client:

Wind turbine manufacturer

Role:

Independent design verification consultant
Structural analysis consultant

Period:

2024

Scope:

Structural FEA and stress analysis
Manual verification calculations
Structural substantiation report

Acceptance basis:

Client-supplied design and loads
Eurocode 3:

  • Strength, joint and fatigue provisions

Supporting guidance from:
  • BS 7608

  • BS EN 61400-2

  • BS EN 40-3-1

  • CD 354

Key moves

Built a reference model and FE model suite

  • Produced a 3D reference model from the client drawings and 3D data for geometry checks, measurement, illustrations and FE model generation.
  • Built the analysis models required for the different mast positions and assessment types, including strength, modal and fatigue analysis.

Established the load regime and ran the verification

  • Defined the loading basis and applied it across the model suite for the relevant operational and maintenance conditions.
  • Solved and reviewed the models to identify the governing cases, critical details and areas requiring revision.

Advised on revisions and verified the final design

  • Presented the initial findings and advised the client on practical options for addressing the areas requiring revision.
  • Updated the FE models to reflect the revised design and re-ran the analyses, with the revised arrangement meeting the defined acceptance criteria.

Documented the verification in a formal report

  • Collated the final results into a structural substantiation report covering the design basis, applicable standards, modelling approach, load cases, governing results and conclusions.
  • Completed supporting manual calculations to cross-check the FE results and finalise the verification package.

Selected snapshots

Outcome

The revised mast design was substantiated against the agreed structural design basis, including relevant steel design, fatigue and wind-turbine standards and guidance. Frugal issued a formal structural substantiation report for client review and approval, documenting the modelling approach, load cases, governing results and supporting manual calculations as a traceable verification package.

What this enabled

This gave the client a documented engineering basis for final design review and progression into procurement and fabrication. It also recorded the governing behaviours, agreed revisions and supporting evidence so that the design decisions could be reviewed and carried forward into manufacture.

Got an engineering design problem to solve?

Tell me what you're dealing with and I'll let you know whether I can help.